USA · UK · KSA · INDIA | info@hanosys.comGlobal
Home / Solutions / GRC Solutions
HANOSYS / SOLUTIONS

Governance, Risk & Compliance Solutions

Connect policies, risks, controls and audit evidence in a practical governance environment. HANOSYS helps organisations evaluate and configure GRC technology around their actual obligations and workflows.

OVERVIEW

GRC Solutions for your business

Managing separate spreadsheets for every audit and regulatory obligation creates duplicate work and inconsistent reporting. A well-designed GRC system brings ownership, testing, evidence and corrective actions into a shared operating model. HANOSYS approaches platform selection through your existing controls, applicable frameworks, integration needs and internal capacity. The objective is a maintainable system that makes oversight easier without adding unnecessary process.

WHAT WE DELIVER

What this solution covers

Explore the technologies, platforms and capabilities supporting this solution.

Compliance Automation & Control Assurance

Bring framework obligations and operational control evidence into a coordinated monitoring process.

  • Develop a common control catalogue with mappings to applicable standards
  • Connect approved systems for repeatable evidence collection
  • Track control status and investigate changes or exceptions
  • Create management views of compliance progress
  • Maintain gap assessments and remediation priorities

Enterprise & Technology Risk

Make risk decisions visible, assigned and reviewable.

  • Configure enterprise and technology risk registers
  • Define scoring scales, thresholds and risk acceptance rules
  • Route treatment plans, exceptions and approvals
  • Monitor key risk indicators and action status
  • Support scenario-based cyber risk assessments

Policy & Records Governance

Keep governance documents current and traceable.

  • Manage policy drafts, approvals and revision histories
  • Distribute policies and record acknowledgements
  • Connect policy obligations to controls and requirements
  • Schedule document reviews and accountable owners

Audit & Assurance Workflows

Organise testing and findings across the audit lifecycle.

  • Plan assessments and allocate testing responsibilities
  • Manage evidence requests and reviewer access
  • Record findings, owners, deadlines and corrective actions
  • Maintain testing samples and audit trails

Supplier & Third-Party Risk

Apply proportionate oversight to external dependencies.

  • Classify suppliers by service criticality and risk
  • Distribute due diligence assessments and collect responses
  • Schedule reassessments and monitor outstanding issues
  • Track contractual obligations and certification dates

Privacy & Information Governance

Coordinate privacy obligations with security and business operations.

  • Maintain records of personal-data processing
  • Manage privacy request intake and response workflows
  • Document privacy impact assessments and approvals
  • Track consent and preference records where applicable
  • Coordinate incident escalation and notification deadlines

Awareness & Workforce Risk

Provide measurable learning and accountability for staff.

  • Assign training based on role and policy requirements
  • Coordinate approved phishing awareness exercises
  • Track participation, completion and overdue actions
  • Retain evidence for compliance and internal review
OUTCOMES

What you get

  • Less repetitive audit work: Use reusable control mappings and connected evidence sources to reduce manual preparation.
  • Consistent control ownership: Give each requirement an accountable owner, testing frequency and escalation route.
  • Clearer risk reporting: Present current risks, open actions and control exceptions in accessible dashboards.
  • Better supplier oversight: Apply scheduled checks and follow-up workflows to higher-risk third parties.
  • More reliable governance records: Maintain traceable decisions, approvals and version history.
  • A sustainable operating model: Provide administrators with documented workflows and knowledge transfer.
WHY HANOSYS

How we deliver

  • Requirements-led selection: Assess platform fit against frameworks, workflows, integration needs and total operating cost.
  • Vendor-neutral evaluation: Consider existing licensed capabilities alongside specialist GRC products.
  • Practical implementation: Start with useful controls and workflows, then extend coverage in manageable stages.
  • Operational ownership: Design responsibilities and review cycles so the platform remains useful after deployment.
ENGAGEMENT

How we engage

01

1. Understand obligations

Review applicable requirements, stakeholders, existing controls and pain points.

02

2. Compare options

Evaluate candidate platforms against agreed functional and technical criteria.

03

3. Design the model

Define control libraries, roles, integrations, workflows and reporting requirements.

04

4. Plan delivery

Agree scope, dependencies, milestones and commercial assumptions.

05

5. Configure and validate

Implement priority modules, test integrations and verify evidence workflows.

06

6. Transfer and improve

Document administration, train owners and establish a roadmap for ongoing refinement.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How should we choose a GRC platform?

Begin with the frameworks you must address, the processes you want to improve and the tools you already use. Lightweight compliance automation may suit a focused programme; broader integrated risk management may require a larger platform.

What affects GRC implementation time?

The number of modules, control maturity, data quality, approval paths and integration complexity all affect the schedule. A phased plan with clear ownership is more dependable than a fixed duration promised before discovery.

Can a single control support multiple frameworks?

Often, yes. A unified control library can map one activity and its evidence to several requirements, while preserving framework-specific testing or reporting where necessary.

Will automation eliminate manual compliance work?

No. Automated collection can reduce repetitive tasks, but control owners still need to review exceptions, assess evidence quality and approve risk decisions.

Plan a GRC solution that fits your organisation

Share the frameworks, audit demands and governance workflows you need to support. HANOSYS can discuss an approach to platform selection and phased implementation.

Contact Hanosys →